Cooth
Member
Topics: 59 Replies: 3588
Registered: 02.Jan.03 |
A.K.E. wrote on 14 Nov. (19:24) :
LOL the reviews are a confused and muddled mess to someone just visiting this site. Dont get me wrong, this system is great for the artists themselves... But honestly it would look a bit "unserious" to newcomer listeners. |
Could you elaborate? |
|
randor
Administrator
Topics: 560 Replies: 2948
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
| Exactly. That's what I wanted you say. Now, suggestions? |
|
Chris Edberg
Member
Topics: 47 Replies: 2575
Registered: 04.Aug.03 |
| I think you guys haven't followed the former topics, where I've actually made some suggestions (and elaborated myself.) |
|
Chris Edberg
Member
Topics: 47 Replies: 2575
Registered: 04.Aug.03 |
Cooth wrote on 14 Nov. (19:39) :
A.K.E. wrote on 14 Nov. (19:24) :
LOL the reviews are a confused and muddled mess to someone just visiting this site. Dont get me wrong, this system is great for the artists themselves... But honestly it would look a bit "unserious" to newcomer listeners. |
Could you elaborate? |
I'm not saying all the reviews are bad, but most of them looks a bit..... Unserious. But I dont think thats the reason why we dont get any more listeners, I just heard someone mentioned the reviewing system and listeners... Etc |
|
randor
Administrator
Topics: 560 Replies: 2948
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
a.k.e. wrote on 14 Nov. (19:41) :
|
Exactly. That's what I wanted you say. Now, suggestions? |
What?!?!?!
I think you should read a bit more from the former topics... I'm not gonna bring this up for the 7th time. |
Sorry, I didn't mean you personally, artists generally
Besides, I think ace has planned something upon your suggestion..... |
|
Chris Edberg
Member
Topics: 47 Replies: 2575
Registered: 04.Aug.03 |
randor wrote on 14 Nov. (19:50) :
a.k.e. wrote on 14 Nov. (19:41) :
|
Exactly. That's what I wanted you say. Now, suggestions? |
What?!?!?!
I think you should read a bit more from the former topics... I'm not gonna bring this up for the 7th time. |
Sorry, I didn't mean you personally, artists generally
Besides, I think ace has planned something upon your suggestion..... |
I'm sorry, I misunderstood you. I just figured out, before you replied this again, and edited the last message.
What, I thought I had a pretty good suggestion, but not like it would be in that way?! I haven't heard anything from Ace... LOL
What I've read from his posts before though is that he doesn't plan to change the reviewing system. |
|
acecream
Staff / Moderator
Topics: 391 Replies: 3361
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
 |
a.k.e. wrote on 14 Nov. (19:54) :
What, I thought I had a pretty good suggestion, but not like it would be in that way?! I haven't heard anything from Ace... LOL
What I've read from his posts before though is that he doesn't plan to change the reviewing system. |
That is correct, the system stays as it is in general, and by that i mean that i dont plan to implement new ways of reviewing alternatives (quick ratings, advanced reviews, official reviews...). There is a comment and a review option not counting other alternative options as sending private message or email to artist. So it is more then enought ways to give the feedback or share your opinion about the song.
But what can be improved here is the current system meaning that i could actualy make forms where you could write advanced reviews, where you would rate and comment many different aspects of the songs from strocture to sound quality and so on, only that it would count same as normal review, it would have one general rating and all the comments together with ratings would be merged/gathered into one nicely formated text (ussing highlighted text and so on). |
|
vitaliko
Artist
Topics: 5 Replies: 325
Registered: 20.Apr.03 |
I`m afraid I`m not following. What good will that do
A wise man once said: "hello".
I`m sure he had. |
|
obScene
Member
Topics: 137 Replies: 3482
Registered: 08.Aug.03 |
XAVT wrote on 15 Nov. (13:11) :
I`m afraid I`m not following. What good will that do
A wise man once said: "hello".
I`m sure he had. |
Its just a "roadmap for peace" as we would call it in America :>
I think this would work... as it motivate people to wirte better reviews. Maybe some here will still not use it properly... but if I had a bunch of text boxes to fill out it may prompt me to write more. ( did I understand you Ace that you wanted to have a rating for each feild? )
Plus I think new members would see this and automatically think this was normal "since this is the first they have seen" and may write bigger and more informative reviews from the start.
BTW I have been doing longer reviews.. and watching everyone else I am seeing the whole community has stepped it up a notch. I think we need to thank Mark for this! |
|
Chris Edberg
Member
Topics: 47 Replies: 2575
Registered: 04.Aug.03 |
 |
That is correct, the system stays as it is in general, and by that i mean that i dont plan to implement new ways of reviewing alternatives (quick ratings, advanced reviews, official reviews...). There is a comment and a review option not counting other alternative options as sending private message or email to artist. So it is more then enought ways to give the feedback or share your opinion about the song.
But what can be improved here is the current system meaning that i could actualy make forms where you could write advanced reviews, where you would rate and comment many different aspects of the songs from strocture to sound quality and so on, only that it would count same as normal review, it would have one general rating and all the comments together with ratings would be merged/gathered into one nicely formated text (ussing highlighted text and so on). |
I think I understand what you mean and I think its not a bad idea... Obscene got a point in his post as well. It would be nice if this "big" review would always be on top on the page (over the other reviews I mean) even if it doesn't affect the overall rating more than any other review. It would look more nice, and new visitors would look at it first...
I think its worth testning (at least)...
XAVT: Why are you sceptic? |
|
 |
|
 |
|