CTG Music Community www.ctgmusic.com - 19 May - 1 onliner | 4 chatters - 21:56
CTG Music Community
  No production of the week has been chosen yet.
Home Music Forum Charts Community Links LOGIN / SIGN UP
Write New Topic Latest Topics Latest Offtopics All Search

  General   News   Contests   Music Production   Chat   Suggestions   Spam&Stuff   Polls   Help   Other 
Write new reply Forum ~ Polls ~ What do you think of the ratings here? Forum rules!
What do you think of the ratings here? [POLLS]

What do you think of the ratings here?
Great (!?!?)
Ok
Better than elsewhere
Poor
A joke - ratings aren't consistent
[view results]

Pages:  [1]  2  3  4 
Dreamz
ArtistArtist

Topics: 12
Replies: 141


Registered: 08.Feb.04
Write new replySun 21 Mar. 2004 (12:11) [80.4.224.4] 1/38 quick link
not the actuall descriptions, or the rating method itself - but the ratings given out by people.

my view is that there are many people reviewing inconsistantly and as such make the whole system a joke.

yes you can have varying view from different reviewers on different tracks, but when the same reviewer is rating one song which is very good, averagely, and rating another song which in comparison to that track is very poor, well, then its a joke.

too much `flavour` of the moment. i work with figures day in day out, monitoring/processes etc - and if you haven't got reliable figures then you may as well not have any at all.

why not just have `reviews` and perhaps leave the `ratings` to select people/admins etc.

if the rating didn't affect the chart position/popularity of a track then it wouldn't matter what people scored.
Write new reply Send private message Send email http://soundcloud.com/dreamzmusic Back to top Go to bottom
Void Pointer
ArtistArtist
http://partyflock.nl/images/user/174242_small.jpg
Topics: 68
Replies: 5292


Registered: 08.Feb.03
Write new replySun 21 Mar. 2004 (12:33) [81.59.14.201] 2/38 quick link
dr3amz wrote on 21 Mar. (12:11) :
why not just have `reviews` and perhaps leave the `ratings` to select people/admins etc.


This is suggested alot of times, aswell as discussed alot.

I think you shouldn't care about the rating, if the reviewer gives good arguments leave it then. Why do people care so much about ratings? It's about the feedback itself, and not about a silly number.
New release @ DD (1963 hits) !!
Write new reply Send private message Send email MSN address http://www.myspace.com/lemii Back to top Go to bottom
UncleDavid
MemberMember

Topics: 6
Replies: 193


Registered: 09.Nov.03
Write new replySun 21 Mar. 2004 (12:56) [195.67.207.115] 3/38 quick link

It's about the feedback itself, and not about a silly number.


I agree , dump the numbers!
Airscape - Sosei
Write new reply Send private message Send email MSN address Back to top Go to bottom
Analysis
ArtistArtist

Topics: 72
Replies: 6282


Registered: 16.Mar.03
Write new replySun 21 Mar. 2004 (12:58) [62.58.116.36] 4/38 quick link
dr3amz wrote on 21 Mar. (12:11) :

yes you can have varying view from different reviewers on different tracks, but when the same reviewer is rating one song which is very good, averagely, and rating another song which in comparison to that track is very poor, well, then its a joke.



Obviously you and the reviewer see things different. That's not a reason to say that the system is crap.
Someone should make fun out of you. Why don't you do it yourself?
Write new reply Send private message Send email MSN address Back to top Go to bottom
Randor
AdministratorAdministrator

Topics: 560
Replies: 2948


Registered: 27.Dec.02
Write new replySun 21 Mar. 2004 (13:11) [80.223.50.183] 5/38 quick link
Well, I explained my thoughts on pm, but will do it here too.

It's impossible to create a coherent formula for ratings/scores. This because peoples taste isn't coherent. You like some stuff and others will say it's crap. Don't say you never collide to this. Only issue we can rate at least someway coherent is technical quality and even that depends listeners monitoring system. That's also why I'm pretty tolreate what comes to ratings, if scores are well-grounded I don't see a problem. However it's became more an more abvious that some people think that technical quality is actually main factor of ratings, completely forgotten ideological content. So far we end up this: there's people who thinks they know how others should rate. There is songs you have to like and songs wich must be bashed since it's crappy from this ultimate musicians viewpoint.

Note that I'm not pointing anyone with my finger least to you dr3amz, but generally this issue has occured bit too frequently.
Write new reply Send private message Send email MSN address http://www.mp3.com.au/randor Back to top Go to bottom
a98
ArtistArtist
http://users.kymp.net/anssi.hohti/avatars/100.jpg
Topics: 32
Replies: 2725


Registered: 26.Oct.03
Write new replySun 21 Mar. 2004 (13:24) [80.248.106.5] 6/38 quick link
the ratings here are way better and accurate than anywhere else, which is something to be atleast a bit satisfied.
http://www.anssihohti.tk (2079 hits)
Write new reply Send private message Send email http://www.allendemusic.net Back to top Go to bottom
Flinck
ArtistArtist

Topics: 58
Replies: 5409


Registered: 30.May.03
Write new replySun 21 Mar. 2004 (13:39) [80.222.13.218] 7/38 quick link
Henson wrote on 21 Mar. (12:56) :


It's about the feedback itself, and not about a silly number.


I agree , dump the numbers!


No way! I like numbers. If you don't you can ignore them :yes:
:sleep: Don't moderate me!
Write new reply Send private message Send email Back to top Go to bottom
obScene
MemberMember

Topics: 137
Replies: 3482


Registered: 08.Aug.03
Write new replySun 21 Mar. 2004 (14:25) [209.42.156.254] 8/38 quick link
Here we go again: :badday:

I think everything is fine as it is. It's not causing anyone any grief, surely.
I'm Bored
Write new reply Send private message Send email MSN address http://www.harlancountytrails.com Back to top Go to bottom
AimeeB
ArtistArtist

Topics: 45
Replies: 168


Registered: 11.Jun.03
Write new replySun 21 Mar. 2004 (14:52) [81.128.185.71] 9/38 quick link
imo there will be discussions prob for along time about the ratings being there, and weather they should be there in the first place, but assured u lot would miss them if they went  ;) :yes:
---------------------------------------------------------
:D yippie 24bit in cubase sx2 rox :D
Write new reply Send private message Send email MSN address http://www.aimeeb.net Back to top Go to bottom
Kevin Zhan
ArtistArtist

Topics: 85
Replies: 2680


Registered: 09.Feb.03
Write new replySun 21 Mar. 2004 (16:09) [68.100.109.43] 10/38 quick link
a98 wrote on 21 Mar. (13:24) :

the ratings here are way better and accurate than anywhere else, which is something to be atleast a bit satisfied.


i agree, the system is fine here, but hey, maybe we could add more intervals? like 7.25?
Write new reply Send private message Send email MSN address Back to top Go to bottom
Pages:  [1]  2  3  4 
Write new reply


3778 Days Online * About Us * Advertising * Credits * Sitemap * Disclaimer * www.ctgmusic.com TopTop
Webdesign by Gaj Capuder, hosted by Yannick Delwiche, menu graphic by Linus Ymén