 |
|  Wrong link on my last release. Sorry. [SPAM] | |
|
 |
FeralCode
  Member
Topics: 125
Replies: 1202
Registered: 19.Mar.03 |
I beg your pardon, you did this song? If so, it is high time to find a label and make a deal, you know. If not...
.jpg) |
|
acecream
 Staff / Moderator
Topics: 391
Replies: 3361
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
Doriath wrote on 25 May. (23:01) :
I beg your pardon, you did this song? If so, it is high time to find a label and make a deal, you know. If not...
|
This is quite direct.
But anyway personaly i hardly belive you made those mp3 songs too, they are too good to be released over here since they fit on stage/radio/tv not on internet.
Also what bugs me are your IT files which are musicaly excelent but tehnicaly really weak so i would guess that those are edited midi files.
We had very similar case before where artist had superb music he was most active reviewer and he constantly seeked for attention thats why me and doriath are suspicious. I hope we both are wrong and your music really is yours.
 |
|
AKiSeY
 Artist
Topics: 24
Replies: 839
Registered: 28.May.03 |
acecream wrote on 25 May. (23:10) :
Doriath wrote on 25 May. (23:01) :
I beg your pardon, you did this song? If so, it is high time to find a label and make a deal, you know. If not...
|
This is quite direct.
But anyway personaly i hardly belive you made those mp3 songs too, they are too good to be released over here since they fit on stage/radio/tv not on internet.
Also what bugs me are your IT files which are musicaly excelent but tehnicaly really weak so i would guess that those are edited midi files.
We had very similar case before where artist had superb music he was most active reviewer and he constantly seeked for attention thats why me and doriath are suspicious. I hope we both are wrong and your music really is yours.
|
The mp3 songs are very good indeed... But the "too good" songs are usualy quite suspicious. Well, if PLUKS realy did this, I say respect 
But if it's Alphahelix 2 , this would be one more sad story for CTG
 |
|
PLUKS
Staff / Moderator
Topics: 120
Replies: 1319
Registered: 06.May.04 |
Oh, they're really mine. I'm surprised because I couldn't imagine someone would think thery're not mine. There's a great lot of better songs here. How can I prove they're mine? The difference between source files and mp3 is that those IT format files were made a long time ago, so my skills were poor and so  And mp3 (except La Mancha) are from my band although composed and arranged by me. For my band's music I not only use a tracker, but complex sequencers and expensive tools, so sound quality is quite far frommy IT tracks. |
|
John Marwin
Artist
Topics: 58
Replies: 1842
Registered: 30.Jun.03 |
There is an easy way to settle this, why don´t anybody give PLUKS a new song to start on, something that sounds roughly into this style,a beginning, then he can contiune the track and finish it, end of discussion.
either that, or maybe some sources perhaps?
J/M/T/M |
|
acecream
Staff / Moderator
Topics: 391
Replies: 3361
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
 |
PLUKS wrote on 26 May. (14:15) :
Oh, they're really mine. I'm surprised because I couldn't imagine someone would think thery're not mine. There's a great lot of better songs here. How can I prove they're mine? The difference between source files and mp3 is that those IT format files were made a long time ago, so my skills were poor and so And mp3 (except La Mancha) are from my band although composed and arranged by me. For my band's music I not only use a tracker, but complex sequencers and expensive tools, so sound quality is quite far frommy IT tracks. |
The reasons why we think those arent yours are just guessing generaly but i think it is better to do so then to simply say ok it is all yours since and leave a chance for some to play around with our members.
So the reasons are:
1. Your mp3 music is too good to be released for free on internet.
2. Your name is totaly unknown in scene, you just came from nowhere saying you do music for 7 years now. Im sure there would have to be at least some little record about you on some website or so?
3. Your IT songs seems to midi files loaded into tracker since some of them have full midi libary attached to it. Also they are musicaly superb and on the other side they are tehnicaly totaly bad. Honestly i never saw such thing in tracked song, quality always comes musicaly and tehnicaly from my expiriences.
4. Also all your IT files were saved/modified durring March 2004 which is also a bit strange since it means you must have been working on all your songs then aswell even if you were suppose to make them years ago.
5. You are saying you combine old school tracker with expensive tools (which?).
6. Your profile somehow matches the one some ripper a while ago had. Which is extreme activity and urge to recive reviews which is not that usual thing with profesional artists which you are if you made those songs.
It can all be false accusations but again it is better to be 100% sure and accuse someone as to be wrong and let someone play around with our members.
So i hope you will take your time and try to answer to the points i mention above, just to make sure everything is ok.
|
|
PLUKS
Staff / Moderator
Topics: 120
Replies: 1319
Registered: 06.May.04 |
|
acecream wrote on 26 May. (14:40) :
PLUKS wrote on 26 May. (14:15) :
Oh, they're really mine. I'm surprised because I couldn't imagine someone would think thery're not mine. There's a great lot of better songs here. How can I prove they're mine? The difference between source files and mp3 is that those IT format files were made a long time ago, so my skills were poor and so And mp3 (except La Mancha) are from my band although composed and arranged by me. For my band's music I not only use a tracker, but complex sequencers and expensive tools, so sound quality is quite far frommy IT tracks. |
The reasons why we think those arent yours are just guessing generaly but i think it is better to do so then to simply say ok it is all yours since and leave a chance for some to play around with our members.
So the reasons are:
1. Your mp3 music is too good to be released for free on internet.
2. Your name is totaly unknown in scene, you just came from nowhere saying you do music for 7 years now. Im sure there would have to be at least some little record about you on some website or so?
3. Your IT songs seems to midi files loaded into tracker since some of them have full midi libary attached to it. Also they are musicaly superb and on the other side they are tehnicaly totaly bad. Honestly i never saw such thing in tracked song, quality always comes musicaly and tehnicaly from my expiriences.
4. Also all your IT files were saved/modified durring March 2004 which is also a bit strange since it means you must have been working on all your songs then aswell even if you were suppose to make them years ago.
5. You are saying you combine old school tracker with expensive tools (which?).
6. Your profile somehow matches the one some ripper a while ago had. Which is extreme activity and urge to recive reviews which is not that usual thing with profesional artists which you are if you made those songs.
It can all be false accusations but again it is better to be 100% sure and accuse someone as to be wrong and let someone play around with our members.
So i hope you will take your time and try to answer to the points i mention above, just to make sure everything is ok.
|
Ok,
1st. I haven't been contracted by any record label, so I prefer my music being free on internet than being at home with me.
2nd. I started making tracked music on 1997, but I it's now when I have access to an internet connection. Here in Spain is not so easy to have one. Before I used to use some connections of my friends to download some samples or software for my songs. I also didn't know how to upload songs because I didn't know any hosting tracked related serever.
3rd. I only composed and I couldn't improve my technical skills because I wasn't in touch with any other tracker, so nobody could tell me how to make thigs better. 
4th. I didn't want to change many things of my tracked songs because they're the proof of my past years situation. I just modified some pannings and volumes.  Maybe I would have to modify them completely, but I'll make it later.
5th. Expensive tools are not mine. They came with drum player of my band. But, I've been making tracks on old style during the last 7 years and I love doing it.
6th. I've made 83 reviews and recieved 6, and if I don't recieve a single review since now I don't really care. I don't know my profile is similar to who, but I'm not a ripper, in fact, the singer of my mp3 songs is ME! and the female voice is my GIRLFRIEND! I don't know how to make you believe me. My activity these days is due to my free time these days. Soon I'll have my final exams and you will have some days for relax without me but when I finish them I'll be back contributing with this community because this is what I've been searching the last 7 years. I review because I think I have to, I use the forum to know about people, I upload my songs because I want them be heard, and I am here to learn. |
|
acecream
Staff / Moderator
Topics: 391
Replies: 3361
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
Ok. Thank you for not being mad and taking your time and explaining the situation.
|
|
PLUKS
Staff / Moderator
Topics: 120
Replies: 1319
Registered: 06.May.04 |
acecream wrote on 26 May. (15:13) :
Ok. Thank you for not being mad and taking your time and explaining the situation.
|
I only hope you believe me. It would be too hard to me if somebody think I'm a ripper. |
|
Void Pointer
Artist
Topics: 68
Replies: 5292
Registered: 08.Feb.03 |
PLUKS wrote on 26 May. (15:20) :
acecream wrote on 26 May. (15:13) :
Ok. Thank you for not being mad and taking your time and explaining the situation.
|
I only hope you believe me. It would be too hard to me if somebody think I'm a ripper. |
It's just that we had alot of other rippers
sigh |
|
|
Latest Topics
![[81.182.24.216]](pics/ip.gif){kind=small}
