acecream
  Staff / Moderator
Topics: 391
Replies: 3361
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
Again with a little delay we anounce the new reviewer of the week.
The reviewer of this week is Jussi "Randor" Tunkkari who wrote really nice amount of reviews, which are even more worth since he does not have a fast internet connection.  
So check him out at : http://www.ctgmusic.com/randor
From now on the weekly reviewer of the week award system will be a little different. The same artist can get awarded more then once from now on, so simply each week the one who will write most reviews will get the free banner and some extra promotion. 
good luck!  |
|
Meltic StOrm
 Guest / not logged |
acecream wrote on 16 Apr. (19:56) :
Again with little delay we anounce new reviewer of the week.
This time the "honor" goes to Jussi "Randor" Tunkkari who wrote really nice amount of reviewes which are worth even more since he does not have fast internet connection.
So check him out at : http://www.ctgmusic.com/randor
But from now on reviewer of the week award will be changed a bit. Same artist can get it more then once from now on, so simply each week the one who will wrote most reviews will get free banner and some extra promotion.
good night! |
Hmmm, would be kinda boring if we got the same reviewer of the week avery week. What about this: If you become the reviewer of the week, week 1, you can't be it either week 2 or 3. But week 4 you could be it again if you review enough?
Ohh, alot of weeks here 
One man once said, don't listen to old sayings.... |
|
acecream
Staff / Moderator
Topics: 391
Replies: 3361
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
Meltic StOrm wrote on 17 Apr. (1:57) :
Hmmm, would be kinda boring if we got the same reviewer of the week avery week. What about this: If you become the reviewer of the week, week 1, you can't be it either week 2 or 3. But week 4 you could be it again if you review enough?
Ohh, alot of weeks here
One man once said, don't listen to old sayings.... |
I dont really belive some guy we be most active reviewer for some straigth 4 months, but if that happen i guess reconsideration will be needed, oh and szartd and me wont ever be reviewer oo the week so you guys have more chances
www.acecream.cutetrancegirls.com |
|
benefit of the boomerang
 Member
Topics: 26
Replies: 1886
Registered: 01.Jan.03 |
If you don't like to see the same reviewer of the week for 2 weeks..
Then write some fukken reviews!!
Í think it's a good idea! If people see the same person in the spotlights, they might
get a review-rush themselves 
By the way, congrats Randor! |
|
Cooth
Member
Topics: 59
Replies: 3588
Registered: 02.Jan.03 |
Congrats Randor, lots of great work done. 
I don't see any reason why someone who's been most active during, say, 3 weeks, shouldn't be awarded 3 times in a row. Hey, it's not president election!
I only hope quality will be always along with quantity in this review-rush you mention.  |
|
Meltic
 Artist
Topics: 5
Replies: 192
Registered: 01.Jan.03 |
Boomerang wrote on 17 Apr. (7:45) :
If you don't like to see the same reviewer of the week for 2 weeks..
Then write some fukken reviews!! |
Was that for me?
Anyway, It's kinda hard for people without fast connection to download and review more than one on a cable. With modem a song on 5-6 mb can take very long time, so long that you could download plenty of songs with cable during that time (We all know this). And about what Cooth said, I'm afraid that we will get bad reviews just cause a person wants to do the most reviews on a week. And if a review doesn't help the artist to understand what he could improve in his track it doesn't matter if you wrote it.
Hmmm, I both disagee and agree in this thread
One man once said, don't listen to old sayings.... |
|
Cooth
Member
Topics: 59
Replies: 3588
Registered: 02.Jan.03 |
Meltic StOrm wrote on 17 Apr. (9:56) :
And about what Cooth said, I'm afraid that we will get bad reviews just cause a person wants to do the most reviews on a week. And if a review doesn't help the artist to understand what he could improve in his track it doesn't matter if you wrote it.
|
Well sorry for going a little off topic here, coz it's not much connected with the reviewer of the week thingy, but bad reviews are what I was afraid ever since the site launched. Ace and Szartd decided for a free reviewing system, in which anyone can write what they want and no monitoring, no probation etc. takes place. There are both pros and cons of both approaches. CTG one is working quite well so far, but there are relatively few artists and the site is in its childhood i'd say.
Anyway, whereas the reviewing system is free and uncensored, I think while picking reviewer of the week, quality should be even more important than the number of reviews written. |
|
acecream
Staff / Moderator
Topics: 391
Replies: 3361
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
yes i think that we should now only pick reviewe of the week based on the "number", me and szartd will try to pick a guy who wrote best reviews. (quality + quantity) so 2 awesome reviewes cant make you a reviewer of the week and 30 bad ones neither, it has to be something in the middle.
www.acecream.cutetrancegirls.com |
|
Szartd
Member
Topics: 76
Replies: 1592
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
Heh , no wI am confused , I just looked at the reviewer top list , and I see that the ones who allready were reviewer of the weeks are marked as "cannot be reviewer of the week" ...
So what is the system now then ?
Or are we still thinking of how it should become 
een appel valt niet ver van de boom als het een peer is ! www.mp3.com/szartd |
|
acecream
Staff / Moderator
Topics: 391
Replies: 3361
Registered: 27.Dec.02 |
|
|
Latest Topics
![[213.250.63.98]](pics/ip.gif){kind=small}
