Cdnalsi
  Member
Topics: 239
Replies: 2221
Registered: 17.Jan.03 |
It's a name.. from a very special language 
|
|
Louigi Verona
Member
Topics: 384
Replies: 3827
Registered: 22.Aug.03 |
LPChip wrote on 20 Oct. (20:18) :
Thanks Louigy 
Does that mean, it'll be sulped to the CBL language?
and what about sulped? 
I think I get to understand the language a bit
|
keep in mind that sulp will not mean 'added', because that word already exists in English. Each word in CBL has a very complex rich meaning (or dumb), which differs from words that already exist. That's why CBL is an extension of English, not it's substitute.
http://www.elephants.org/ |
|
Louigi Verona
Member
Topics: 384
Replies: 3827
Registered: 22.Aug.03 |
updated with the word 'sulp' piped by LPChip!
http://www.sulps.org/ |
|
LPChip
 Administrator
Topics: 39
Replies: 1261
User is online 
Registered: 05.Jun.05 |
Yay! I feel sulped!
You can ask me hundreds "why don't you" questions, answer will be, because it works that way too. - xTr1m |
|
Louigi Verona
Member
Topics: 384
Replies: 3827
Registered: 22.Aug.03 |
added a new word to CBL.
mrow - an insect which feels that it's current way of behaviour can lead it to be eaten by a bird
and also the word 'nafe'.
CBL Dictionary
http://www.elephants.org/ |
|
LPChip
Administrator
Topics: 39
Replies: 1261
User is online
Registered: 05.Jun.05 |
And I though I understood the language... I have absolutelly no clue how you come to the meanings of the words. Not a clue....
You can ask me hundreds "why don't you" questions, answer will be, because it works that way too. - xTr1m |
|
Louigi Verona
Member
Topics: 384
Replies: 3827
Registered: 22.Aug.03 |
 |
LPChip wrote on 24 Oct. (13:39) :
And I though I understood the language... I have absolutelly no clue how you come to the meanings of the words. Not a clue....
|
hm. let me explain then. (though in the beginning of the dictionary there is an example with the word 'shide', should be pretty clear)
I take the piped word and then create ports for it - words which look similar to it + the original word. Then, by using imagination, quite freely, but still in the borders of reasonability, I create a meaning, which goes from the combination of all the ports.
let's take the word sulp - a stubborn horse that has just arrived to a farm located in a swampy area.
I defined three ports for it - plus, pulp, sulk. Here's how the word defining logic worked:
plus - something is being added (arriving)
pulp - something soft (swamp)
sulk - one of the meanings of this word is 'a stubborn horse' (horse)
Now I take those associations and form an image from it - a horse that arrives to a swampy area. logically, to a farm
So, there you go!
http://www.elephants.org/ |
|
xTr1m
Administrator
Topics: 106
Replies: 4441
Registered: 11.Oct.03 |
|
LPChip
Administrator
Topics: 39
Replies: 1261
User is online
Registered: 05.Jun.05 |
Ic...
I though it was the other way around.
I created sulp as in plus to add stuff, but also to plus as in positive. so if I feel sulped, then i feel plussed, which is positive. Is this invalid? or also a good pipe?
You can ask me hundreds "why don't you" questions, answer will be, because it works that way too. - xTr1m |
|
Louigi Verona
Member
Topics: 384
Replies: 3827
Registered: 22.Aug.03 |
LPChip: Well, is there a point in piping an already piped word?
But basically, I sort of left it to myself to make up definitions. If you not only piped the word, but also made up a definition, PM me that and I'll look into it
xTr1m: Yup! What I like about CBL is that it really shortens stuff! Like hieroglyphs!
This is a sulp!, you say pointing to a horse and in one word you showed that this horse is stubborn and that it just arrived. Wonderful!
http://www.sulps.org/ |
|
|
Latest Topics
![[86.106.47.240]](pics/ip.gif){kind=small}
(7.5)
