sonus
  Artist
Topics: 20
Replies: 501
Registered: 26.May.04 |
I have had the same problem with this track.
I'm glad to know I'm not crazy. |
|
Justin T.
 Member
Topics: 48
Replies: 430
Registered: 04.Nov.08 |
|
Louigi Verona
Member
Topics: 384
Replies: 3827
Registered: 22.Aug.03 |
PPH wrote on 07 Nov. (15:02) :
That's not right, though I won't complain because I know changing it means a lot of work.
|
Lots of work? Not really. Just remove the condition that checks whether you are active or not. Commenting this out would take like a couple of minutes for a person who has access to the code. |
|
Justin T.
Member
Topics: 48
Replies: 430
Registered: 04.Nov.08 |
Louigi Verona wrote on 03 Aug. (9:49) :
PPH wrote on 07 Nov. (15:02) :
That's not right, though I won't complain because I know changing it means a lot of work.
|
Lots of work? Not really. Just remove the condition that checks whether you are active or not. Commenting this out would take like a couple of minutes for a person who has access to the code. |
How do you do that? 
CLICK HERE FOR RESULTS!
Visit my homepage please: http://bully34.webs.com (2864 hits) |
|
Louigi Verona
Member
Topics: 384
Replies: 3827
Registered: 22.Aug.03 |
| Accessing the code? I have no idea. |
|
Cooth
Member
Topics: 59
Replies: 3588
Registered: 02.Jan.03 |
PPH wrote on 07 Nov. (15:02) :
xTr1m wrote on 06 Nov. (10:31) :
Blame me. Staff agreed that in order to lower the amount of unreviewed songs, that the unrated songs from inactive members should be marked that way. That was quite some time ago, maybe 1-2 years. Feel free to change that. |
Yes, I read about it then, but I didn't think that, if I unchecked the box, the site would check it again after a while. That's not right, though I won't complain because I know changing it means a lot of work.
Well, someone could just review the song so it doesn't happen again 
|
I think that's quite right, if you think about it. If you haven't been around for a few months, what are the odds you'll be back to read a review if you get one, let alone still be interested in it once your song got old? |
|
Louigi Verona
Member
Topics: 384
Replies: 3827
Registered: 22.Aug.03 |
| I agree. The idea is good and I would've left it. |
|
Justin T.
Member
Topics: 48
Replies: 430
Registered: 04.Nov.08 |
Cooth wrote on 03 Aug. (18:07) :
PPH wrote on 07 Nov. (15:02) :
xTr1m wrote on 06 Nov. (10:31) :
Blame me. Staff agreed that in order to lower the amount of unreviewed songs, that the unrated songs from inactive members should be marked that way. That was quite some time ago, maybe 1-2 years. Feel free to change that. |
Yes, I read about it then, but I didn't think that, if I unchecked the box, the site would check it again after a while. That's not right, though I won't complain because I know changing it means a lot of work.
Well, someone could just review the song so it doesn't happen again
|
I think that's quite right, if you think about it. If you haven't been around for a few months, what are the odds you'll be back to read a review if you get one, let alone still be interested in it once your song got old? |
I would becuase my music sucks!
CLICK HERE FOR RESULTS!
Visit my homepage please: http://bully34.webs.com (2864 hits) |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Latest Topics
![[192.41.245.86]](pics/ip.gif){kind=small}
